<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimum slack time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time</link>
	<description>scratched tallies on the prison wall</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-70674</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-70674</guid>
		<description>hello</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kNo'</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-25301</link>
		<dc:creator>kNo'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-25301</guid>
		<description>I'm surprised you didn't know this article (it says it was written in 1999) - I know it for ages. The problem is that Moore's law tends to be false, as I've been told, so the technique might be wrong at some point.

BTW, that's exactely what computing is all about: being lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t know this article (it says it was written in 1999) - I know it for ages. The problem is that Moore&#8217;s law tends to be false, as I&#8217;ve been told, so the technique might be wrong at some point.</p>
<p>BTW, that&#8217;s exactely what computing is all about: being lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrben</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-25294</link>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-25294</guid>
		<description>Quality idea :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality idea :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davyd</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-25179</link>
		<dc:creator>Davyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2006/11/06/optimum-slack-time#comment-25179</guid>
		<description>We do calculations that take approximately 100 CPUs a week to complete (handwave actual numbers here). So I suppose if we were to do them on one CPU, it would take 2 years.

Of course, clients might get a bit stroppy if they found out we were simply waiting around for new computers while sat on the beech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do calculations that take approximately 100 CPUs a week to complete (handwave actual numbers here). So I suppose if we were to do them on one CPU, it would take 2 years.</p>
<p>Of course, clients might get a bit stroppy if they found out we were simply waiting around for new computers while sat on the beech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
