And this is The wonderful world of mathematics, written , and concerning Musings
Comments
Tony: I don't think anyone has ever looked at Euler's equation for the first time and though "oh yeah, it's so obvious now". It's not at all obvious, but it's true. It comparable to taking, say, your favourite five pieces of architecture in the world, say the Sydney Opera House, the Empire State Building, the Golden Gate Bridge, that spiky cathedral in Barcelona, and the Taj Mahal and stuck them all together and found out that it made a perfect sphere.
The wonder of Euler's equation is that it seems astonishingly unlikely.
Stuart: My usual recourse is to find a book written by someone more convincing than me and steal something from it. Ian Stewart is quite good at getting the point of maths across. Try 'Game, Set, and Math' or 'Math Hysteria'.
I will proofread before posting in future. Grammar in my previous post is left as a exercise for the reader.
I'd recommend Ian Stewart as well, though he does tend to assume quite a mathsy background sometimes.
The nice real-world example I remember from a book of his that I read is using chaos theory to predict and generate random white noise signals, which can then be used to rather effectively cancel out actual noise in the background of recordings.
I'm a 3rd year math major at the University of Toronto. I always love the simple math properties that seem unlikely (at first). There are two things I always show to friends of mine who know nothing about mathematics.
1) Prove that 1.9999 (infinite 9's) equals 2.
2) Share the following pattern: The sum of odd integers add up to perfect squares.
1 = 1
1+3 = 4
1+3+5 = 9
1+3+5+7 =16
1+3+5+7+9 = 25
1+3+5+7+9+11=36
etc.
I just noticed that for the first time a few months ago, and though it's simple, I just found it quite remarkable.
Rory: love the sphere comment. Love it. That's exactly my feeling on the matter :)
Sina: I can feel the edges of a proof as to *why* the sum of odd integers adds to a square. If I can hash that out I might use it as an example.
Back before he was famous, Dave Gorman did a bit of standup all based around a maths class, which was really funny (to 'mathies' and 'non-mathies' alike).
The Whizzkids handbooks (remember those!?!) had nice proofs showing algebraically how 1=0 and 2=1, which always made me laugh.
O... math... i think it is NOT WONDERFUL... remember i had a lot of problems with it at school =).
To prove that the sum of odd numbers is a square, you need to know sigma notation:
The sum of the odd numbers from one to (2n-1) = 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1)
sigma (r=1 to n) 2r-1 = 2*sigma(r) - sigma(1)
= 2*(1/2*n*(n+1)) - n
= n(n+1)-n
=n^2 + n - n
=n^2
Therefore the sum of the odd numbers from 1 to 2n-1 = n^2. so the sum of a consecutive series of odd numbers, starting at 1, must be a square.
I'm currently doing Further Maths A-level. I knew it would come in handy some day.
I don't think anyone apart from Cathy has produced anything interesting that relates to the real world in a practical sense. Do you honestly think that things adding up to other things, regardless of how much of a coincidence it can't be, meets the criteria? I do not. Keep your sums of squares and maths constants.
Cathy was hinting in a direction that would convince most people: signal processing. Signals are a bunch of waves mixed together that do great things, like make your mobile and tv work. Does it get more relevant than that?
What if you're a musician? Got a tremolo or wah-wah pedal? Those, my friends, are just the signals from your guitar passing through a careful signal and getting just the right sort of interference.
So many practical applications.
To keep things easy, you can 'prove' (or show) that the sum of odd integers add up to perfect squares by using pictures. Start with a 1x1 square. In order to create a larger square, you must add 3 to the corner (and you'll get a 2x2). To make the next square, you'll need to now add 5 to the corner (get a 3x3). Next you'll have to add 7 to get a larger square (4x4). Continue to add odd integers to create the next possible square. This is how the Pythagoreans proved this property.
* 1 = 1
* *
* * 1+3 = 4
* * *
* * *
* * * 1+3+5 = 9
* * * *
* * * *
* * * *
* * * * 1+3+5+7 = 16
Cool. Math geeks like myself, all congregating around your blog post.
You guys might enjoy a song I really got a kick out of. Jonathan Coulton wrote a song about the Mandelbrot Set, and it rocks. You can find it here, midway down the page:
http://jonathancoulton.com/songs
Hi there
Great friends, i am an Indian , i love mathematics, done my graduation in Pure Mathematics, but post grads in comp applications.... but couldn't resist my temptation to read your great blog.... Hilberts Hotel is nice.
Hi
As an application of Pure Mathematics you can use to fight terrorism.... i know bit absurd but see the following link
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2005/math-terrorism-0406.html
We can use the lattice theory to fight terrorism and predict results. You can also visit
http://gillinc.blogspot.com/2004/10/mathematics-of-terrorism.html
which tells how ordered sets helps us tracking that..... Mathematics is simply melodious but you need to have knowledge of combining good permutation of notes.
-regards
Madhur sambhar
"Creators Concern is conquest of nature
Parasite's concern is conquest of men " -Howard Roark
Fibonnacci's sequence /spiral
Theseries:
1+2=3
2+3=5
3+5=7
5+7=13
7+13=20
etc. is fibonacci's sequence. Guess you knew that - but a good example of the beauty of maths for non-mathematicians is that this series comes up in things like the spiral patterns of seeds on a sunflower head, and the angles of plant leaves going up the stem.
well a little bit interested in maths ,thanks sambhar for letting me know that maths could even be used for fighting terorism.
I'm sure I'd think maths is great, if i understood it. I don't. One look at an equation causes my brain to fog. I once tried to read "The Anthropic Cosmological Principle" by Barrow and Tipler; some of which was fascinating. But it's full of equations that I completely failed to understand. I also find stuff like cryptography fascinating - I just don't understand 70% of it.