Comments on: And back again http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2005/08/15/againback scratched tallies on the prison wall Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:08:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Tony B http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2005/08/15/againback/comment-page-1#comment-60 Tony B Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2005/08/15/againBack/#comment-60 <p>I thought they were calendrical markers? You should check out “Uriel’s Machine” and the Book of Enoch.</p> I thought they were calendrical markers? You should check out “Uriel’s Machine” and the Book of Enoch.

]]> By: Rob http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2005/08/15/againback/comment-page-1#comment-61 Rob Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2005/08/15/againBack/#comment-61 <p>Ruskin was The Man for many years – his essays and criticism played a big part in the Gothic Revival.</p> <p>http://rob.annable.co.uk/journal.cgi/places/santa_maria_novella</p> Ruskin was The Man for many years – his essays and criticism played a big part in the Gothic Revival.

http://rob.annable.co.uk/journal.cgi/places/santa_maria_novella

]]> By: fong http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2005/08/15/againback/comment-page-1#comment-62 fong Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2005/08/15/againBack/#comment-62 <p>I was working my way thru your book, (Chapter6-validation)and for some strange reasons the code in the form provided “exampleValidation.html” does not seem to flag the empty fields as error on my browsers (firefox 1.0.5 and <span class="caps">IE6</span>.) When I reviewed the regular expressions they seemed to me to be correct. I would be grateful if you could have a look at it again and verify the expected behaviour. Is this a problem with the way browsers have implemented regex? I did not think so.</p> I was working my way thru your book, (Chapter6-validation)and for some strange reasons the code in the form provided “exampleValidation.html” does not seem to flag the empty fields as error on my browsers (firefox 1.0.5 and IE6.) When I reviewed the regular expressions they seemed to me to be correct. I would be grateful if you could have a look at it again and verify the expected behaviour. Is this a problem with the way browsers have implemented regex? I did not think so.

]]> By: fong http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2005/08/15/againback/comment-page-1#comment-63 fong Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2005/08/15/againBack/#comment-63 <p>I re-looked at the code and I understand the behaviours a lot better. The code works as advertised.</p> I re-looked at the code and I understand the behaviours a lot better. The code works as advertised.

]]>