<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I don&#8217;t like databases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/17/databases/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/17/databases</link>
	<description>scratched tallies on the prison wall</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/17/databases#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/17/databases/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>Yay! Down with LAMP! Woo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Down with LAMP! Woo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/17/databases#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/17/databases/#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>Don't know if I'd go &lt;b&gt;quite&lt;/b&gt; that far, but I think the M in LAMP is used by default and it could probably be dispensed with in a fair few cases. If someone comes up with a simple application -- say, it holds contact details -- then I don't want to have to set up a MySQL database for it! If you want SQL, and nothing else needs to share your data, then use SQLite or something.&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, an additional nice thing about a separate database procedure that I forgot: proper concurrent access handling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d go <b>quite</b> that far, but I think the M in LAMP is used by default and it could probably be dispensed with in a fair few cases. If someone comes up with a simple application &#8212; say, it holds contact details &#8212; then I don&#8217;t want to have to set up a MySQL database for it! If you want SQL, and nothing else needs to share your data, then use SQLite or something.<br />
Oh, an additional nice thing about a separate database procedure that I forgot: proper concurrent access handling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/17/databases#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/17/databases/#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>I figured you'd omitted the concurrency issue because you were talking about weblog applications (otherwise I was going to point it out myself :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured you&#8217;d omitted the concurrency issue because you were talking about weblog applications (otherwise I was going to point it out myself :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/17/databases#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/17/databases/#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>Weblog stuff does have to have some kind of concurrency management, because you could have more than one person accessing the weblog at a time...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weblog stuff does have to have some kind of concurrency management, because you could have more than one person accessing the weblog at a time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
