<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deprecate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate</link>
	<description>scratched tallies on the prison wall</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>I used to get this wrong all of the time.&#160; I didn't mean to, I just couldn't pronounce deprecate properly.&#160; I knew I didn't mean that the old API code was worth less.&#160; I think I've got it write now. :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
btw, something that annoys me out of all proportion; "write the developer" instead of "write to".&#160; Arrrgh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to get this wrong all of the time.&nbsp; I didn&#8217;t mean to, I just couldn&#8217;t pronounce deprecate properly.&nbsp; I knew I didn&#8217;t mean that the old API code was worth less.&nbsp; I think I&#8217;ve got it write now. :)</p>
<p>btw, something that annoys me out of all proportion; &#8220;write the developer&#8221; instead of &#8220;write to&#8221;.&nbsp; Arrrgh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>"Write someone" rather than "write to someone" is a pretty standard Americanism, and I'm not going to get into whether American English is "wrong" or not. :-) You score a point for actually &lt;b&gt;knowing&lt;/b&gt; the difference between the two, though; I get the impression that a fair few people don't even know that there are two different words...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Write someone&#8221; rather than &#8220;write to someone&#8221; is a pretty standard Americanism, and I&#8217;m not going to get into whether American English is &#8220;wrong&#8221; or not. :-) You score a point for actually <b>knowing</b> the difference between the two, though; I get the impression that a fair few people don&#8217;t even know that there are two different words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a mute point to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a mute point to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>Arf, arf, arf. Thanks, John. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arf, arf, arf. Thanks, John. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aquarion</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>Aquarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>Moot. as in "And bailey"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moot. as in &#8220;And bailey&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>Nun of you lot are funny, you know. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nun of you lot are funny, you know. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Revell</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Revell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>The real problem comes when you confuse deprecate with defecate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, confusing self-deprecate with the self-depreciate, could only ever be right when applied to prostitutes and other types of consultants :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem comes when you confuse deprecate with defecate. </p>
<p>Of course, confusing self-deprecate with the self-depreciate, could only ever be right when applied to prostitutes and other types of consultants :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbstevens</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>mbstevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&#8220;....a bit of an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;API&lt;/span&gt; that you?re not supposed to use any more&#8230;.&#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Actually, it&#8217;s also used with bits of a language you&#8217;re not supposed to use anymore.  I often see it used in writing about C, Python, and Perl.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.a bit of an <span class="caps">API</span> that you?re not supposed to use any more&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s also used with bits of a language you&#8217;re not supposed to use anymore.  I often see it used in writing about C, Python, and Perl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbstevens</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>mbstevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&#8220;....a bit of an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;API&lt;/span&gt; that you?re not supposed to use any more&#8230;.&#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Actually, it&#8217;s also used with bits of a language you&#8217;re not supposed to use anymore.  I often see it used in writing about C, Python, and Perl.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.a bit of an <span class="caps">API</span> that you?re not supposed to use any more&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s also used with bits of a language you&#8217;re not supposed to use anymore.  I often see it used in writing about C, Python, and Perl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/01/09/deprecate#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kryogenix.org/adpb/2004/01/09/deprecate/#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefuly we are selfappreciating, and not selfdepreciating. I guess we are selfdeprecating in the dead tissue of our fingernails and hair continuing to grow longer. And we are all selfdefecating, because I don&#8217;t know we could hire to do such a job. And what type of tool would they use? Ugh.&lt;/p&gt;
 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefuly we are selfappreciating, and not selfdepreciating. I guess we are selfdeprecating in the dead tissue of our fingernails and hair continuing to grow longer. And we are all selfdefecating, because I don&#8217;t know we could hire to do such a job. And what type of tool would they use? Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
